Mastering Roof Inspections: Hail Damage,
Part 12
by Kenton Shepard and Nick Gromicko
The purpose of the series “Mastering Roof Inspections” is to teach home inspectors,
as well as insurance and roofing professionals, how to recognize proper and improper conditions while inspecting steep-slope,
residential roofs. This series covers roof framing, roofing materials, the attic, and the conditions that affect the roofing
materials and components, including wind and hail.
FORENSICS of
HAIL DAMAGE, Part 6
Identifying Elevation Damage
HAIL DAMAGE on the ROOF
When inspecting for hail damage,
it’s important to understand the methods used by insurance claims adjusters because if damage for which an insurance
company will pay exists, it should be identified and documented using insurance company criteria. Test Squares
Claims adjusters mark off test squares on a roof to document the extent of damage.
The size and locations of test squares are the same no matter what roof-covering material is installed. Here are some test
square details:
- Test squares are 10 feet by 10 feet. A square shape is used whenever possible, but if it’s not
possible to use a square because of the roof shape, other shapes can be used. The test area size should always be 100 square
feet, no matter what the shape.
- Test squares should be placed on each roof slope.
- They should be located in areas with the most damage. They should not be located in areas of a roof which are protected
by things such as overhanging tree branches.
Number of Hits
Once the test square has
been created, the adjuster counts the number of hailstrikes within the square. These hailstrikes have to meet the definition
of functional damage. The number of hits required to replace that slope of roof will vary. Different insurance companies have
different policies. Eight hits is a common number.
Slope/Roof Replacement
The decision of whether
to replace individual slopes or to replace the entire roof requires weighing a number of factors. The age of the roof will
be one factor. Older roofs are more likely to be replaced. Some insurance companies use a formula in making the decision.
Disagreements
Occasionally, a disagreement will arise among insurance companies, roofers, home
inspectors and policy holders about whether damage meets the criteria for roof replacement.
One
area with a lot of potential for disagreement is whether the damage meets the description of “functional damage.”
The characteristics of hail-caused functional damage vary with the different types of
roof-covering materials. It is easier to identify functional damage on some materials than on others.
There’s more potential for disagreement with a material such as asphalt composition shingles, which
may be damaged to some degree. It may be light damage, which does not meet the criteria for functional damage, or it may be
serious damage, which does.
These issues are discussed in detail in InterNACHI's courses on
the individual roof-covering materials.
Resolving Disagreements
The mechanisms for resolving disagreements can vary. The insurance policy is a contract, and in it are certain
provisions for settling disputes. One involves an arbitration process where the policy holder and insurance company
each appoint a representative, and those two agree on a third person. These three act as referees in the process.
Reports from roofers and home inspectors are considered in reaching a determination. This process doesn’t get
used very much.
Instead, policy holders usually complain to the state's department of insurance, whose
job is to make sure that the insurance company complies with the contract terms. They usually can’t force
a company to pay for a roof if there is a lack of sufficient evidence showing roof damage, but they can encourage the company
to pay if the damage criteria are met. They can sanction an insurance company if the company fails to follow the contract.
Another option available to the policy holder who thinks that their insurance company
has not acted according to their contract is to hire an attorney and file a lawsuit.
All content copyright © 2006-2010 the International Association of Certified Home Inspectors, Inc.